Antonio Martinez
In this article, we survey the brain research of religion and radicalization. In doing as such, we note that both full scale level methodologies (that concentrate on underlying circumstances in the public arena) and miniature level methodologies (that emphasis on mental adapting and individual evaluation of individual circumstances) neglect to make sense of revolutionary way of behaving of individuals from outrageous strict gatherings satisfactorily. All things being equal, we suggest that meso-level methodologies best make sense of strict radicalization. These meso-level methodologies make sense of how individuals from outrageous strict gatherings assess cultural circumstances and track down reclamation in revolutionary convictions. Specifically, we contend for a more inside and out assessment of the authentic and cultural settings where different radicalization processes happen and stories of revolutionary recovery hold influence.