GET THE APP

Evidence for the Drd2 Gene as a Determinant of Reward Defici | 101264

Klinische und experimentelle Psychologie

Abstrakt

Evidence for the Drd2 Gene as a Determinant of Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS)

Kenneth Blum1,2,3,4,5,12,*, Abdala Bowirrat1, Igor Elman6 David Baron2, Panayotis K. Thanos7, Mark S Gold8, Colin Hanna6, Milan T. Makale9, Keerthy Sunder10-12, Nicole Jafari13,14, Foojan Zeine15,16, Kevin T. Murphy17, Miles Makale18, Rajendra D. Badgaiyan19

Since 1990, published addiction psychiatry articles have exceeded 11,495. Several from Blum et al. showed the clinical relevance of the Genetic Addiction Risk Severity (GARS) test in identifying risk for reward deficiency behaviors in cohorts from polysubstance and pain clinics, post-surgical bariatrics, and DWI offenders facing prison time. Since Blum et al first published in JAMA (1990) concerning the association of the DRD2 gene polymorphism and severe alcoholism, confirmation has been mixed and controversial. More recently, however, a meta-analysis of 62 studies showed a significant association between DRD2 rs 1800497 and Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD). Other studies from Yale University showed that a haplotype block of the DRD2 gene A1 allele was associated with AUD and heroin dependence. GWAS studies of depression and suicide in 1.2 million veterans confirmed the first psychiatric candidate gene study finding from Blum et al. 1990; a significant association between the minor DRD2 allele, Taq A1 (rs 1800497 C>T) and severe alcoholism. Additionally, the DRD2 rs1800497 is associated with suicide behaviors robustly at P=1.77 X 10.-7. Furthermore, DNA polymorphic alleles underlying SUD with multiple substances were mapped via chromatin refolding, revealed that the DRD2 gene and associated polymorphism(s) was the top gene signal (DRD2, P = 7.9 × 10–12). Additionally, based on these investigations, we conclude that GWAS should end the controversy about the DRD2 gene being at least one determinant of Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS) first reported in the Royal Society of Medicine journal in 1996.

Haftungsausschluss: Diese Zusammenfassung wurde mithilfe von Tools der künstlichen Intelligenz übersetzt und wurde noch nicht überprüft oder verifiziert.